The peculiar legal argument behind Trump’s attack on citizenship was invented by 19th-century anti-Chinese racists.

The Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments in a landmark birthright citizenship case, and Springsteen and the ACLU want ...

The court is gearing up to hear oral arguments in a landmark case about the Trump administration's attempts to rewrite the ...

President Trump has targeted immigrants since his first day in office, and his efforts to eliminate birthright citizenship ...

Oral arguments in the birthright citizenship case Trump v. Barbara are slated to begin April 1, with a ruling expected by the ...

The text is the law, and it is the text that must be observed,” Justice Antonin Scalia famously insisted at page 22 of a ...

Professors Akhil and Vikram Amar have responded to my recent post arguing that the 14th Amendment does not grant automatic ...

This year marks the 128th year of the United States v. Wong Kim Ark, the landmark Supreme Court decision that established ...

The ACLU is defending the 14th Amendment before the Supreme Court in Trump v. Barbara, challenging an executive order that ...

A question that has shadowed Guam and other U.S. territories for more than a century is about to get its closest look yet ...

In a brief to the Supreme Court, the administration argues that the amendment—ratified in 1868 in repudiation of the Dred ...

Editor: This coming April 1, better known as April Fool’s Day, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument on President Trump’s fool’s errand of trying to end Constitutional Birthright ...