1. Los Angeles Rams (10-3), NFC West leaders: They regained the inside track for home-field advantage and a first-round bye ...
Opinion
America 250: Presidential Message on the Anniversary of the Ratification of the 13th Amendment
On this day 160 years ago, the United States of America ratified the 13th Amendment of the Constitution, immortalizing a self-evident principle that ...
The court will consider the constitutionality of Trump’s attempt to redefine the 14th amendment by executive order.
The Supreme Court will decide whether Trump’s birthright citizenship order violates the Constitution
The Supreme Court has agreed to take up the constitutionality of President Donald Trump’s order on birthright citizenship.
The Trump administration is seeking to roll back the historical understanding that birthright citizenship extends to almost ...
In early November, a conservative Supreme Court justice showed a cleareyed understanding of the threat that President Trump ...
AlterNet on MSNOpinion
Supreme Court’s decision on citizenship will depend on its interpretation of one key phrase | Opinion
The Supreme Court on Dec. 5, 2025, agreed to review the long-simmering controversy over birthright citizenship. It will ...
On Dec. 5, the Supreme Court said that it would hear an appeal that could allow Trump to end birthright citizenship for some ...
Critics say the Trump policy violates the clear language of the Constitution’s 14th Amendment and also deals a huge blow to the promise of America as a nation of immigrants and stable laws.
Advocates for each side will provide a different explanation for who falls under ‘the jurisdiction’ of the United States.
The originalist argument in favor of birthright citizenship is that the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction” was meant to invoke only a small set of exceptions found in traditional British common law.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results