SCOTUSblog on MSNOpinion

Callais, originalism, and stare decisis

Justice, Democracy, and Law is a recurring series by Edward B. Foley that focuses on election law and the relationship of law ...
The Supreme Court case comes as several GOP-led states have embarked on rare mid-decade redistricting fights, in attempt to ...
Liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson on Wednesday compared efforts to draw congressional districts along racial lines to the ...
Several of the court’s conservatives appeared hostile to the traditional understanding of the civil rights law.
An amendment making parental decisions a constitutional right would not supersede any state or federal laws, attorneys who ...
In a dispute over a Louisiana voting map, the conservative majority signaled it might prohibit using race as a factor in ...
FPL asked the Public Service Commission to approve a compromise on future development. As FPL’s president writes, it’s a win-win for both sides.
The Supreme Court will convene on Wednesday to hear a legal battle over Louisiana's congressional map that could reverberate ...
If Section 2 no longer required majority-minority districts, then Republicans could use the ruling to redraw congressional ...
A major pillar of the Voting Rights Act that aims to prevent racial discrimination during the redistricting process is in the ...
(THE CONVERSATION) On Oct. 15, 2025, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in one of the most anticipated cases of the 2025-2026 term, Louisiana v. Callais, with major implications for the Voting ...
Dear Editor, Everything Charlie Kirk said in his debates with students is true. Everything students tried to express is also true. How can these two statements both be true?