On December 18, 1967, the Supreme Court ruled in Katz v. United States, expanding the Fourth Amendment protection against “unreasonable searches and seizures” to cover electronic wiretaps. Charles ...

This article explains how new surveillance and biometric tech, like drones and facial recognition, challenge privacy rights.

User-Created Clip by Ivette Lucero February 22, 2018 2018-02-19T20:10:49-05:00 https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org ...

C-SPAN is testing some improvements to our website and we'd like to ask for your help. Please click here to try out our new video viewing page (you can switch back at any time). Law professor Jeffrey ...

Monday was the 50th Anniversary of Katz v. United States, the Supreme Court's big decision on the Fourth Amendment's "search" test. I often hear that Katz created a vague and non-textual notion of ...

In the world of American privacy law, one Supreme Court decision casts a long shadow over all others: Katz v. United States. In that decision, which was handed down in December 1967, the court ...

Charles Katz made his money from basketball. On most mornings, he’d enter a phone booth on Sunset Blvd., in his hometown of Los Angeles, and wire illegal gambling wagers to Miami and Boston. The FBI ...

The Fourth Amendment (Amendment IV) to the United States Constitution is the part of the Bill of Rights that prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and requires any warrant to be judicially ...