Part one of Anthony Sabino’s two-part series analyzing Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. Garland holding the Corporate Transparency ...

Thus, the Constitution gave Congress the power to regulate interstate ... the states’ ability to tax commerce entering and leaving their borders. Indeed, the clause was likely understood ...

Nor was it “proper” for the federal government to prohibit a non-economic activity under the guise of protecting interstate commerce. The second constitutional role of the Commerce Clause is ...

The Commerce Clause lets Congress “regulate commerce ... consumption is a commercial activity that substantially affects interstate commerce in the aggregate.” The Supreme Court precedent ...

On February 3, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California granted a motion to dismiss filed by the California Air ...

Washington. “The capital gains tax violates the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which reserves to Congress the right to regulate interstate commerce, thus depriving states of the ...

striking down racial segregation on interstate buses as a violation of the interstate commerce clause. In December 1960, Boynton v. Virginia expanded the Morgan decision, outlawing segregated ...

Raich held that the Necessary and Proper Clause permits Congress to criminalize ... even if the marijuana has never actually traveled in interstate commerce. Adler also contended that if the ...

The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution ... preempted by the Interstate Horseracing Act and violate the Interstate Commerce Clause. TwinSpires lost a similar lawsuit filed in ...

The court also held that the Dormant Commerce Clause was not implicated because the statute treats all in-state and out-of-state parties equally and neither burdens interstate commerce nor favors ...

At this point, it was “not clear to the Court that any possible regulations CARB issues would impermissibly burden interstate commerce or violate the Supremacy Clause.” In addition ...