The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. thus the right of women to vote is equal to that of men, and ...
The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution has been the center of controversy since it was adopted on July 9, 1868 -- 157 years ago today. Born of Reconstruction, it was hotly debated by Northern ...
Warning: This graphic requires JavaScript. Please enable JavaScript for the best experience. This week the Supreme Court considers its most consequential case ...
Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment prohibits anyone who engaged in insurrection against the U.S. from holding federal or state office. The U.S. Supreme Court in March ruled that the ...
The Civil War ended 160 years ago. The racist Jim Crow laws of the post-Civil War era were outlawed in the 1960s. It is time for the United States to uphold the words of the 14th Amendment to the ...
Hosted on MSN
What is the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution?
NEW YORK (PIX11) – After a federal court ruled that President Donald Trump’s order seeking to end birthright citizenship is unconstitutional, searches for the 14th Amendment have surged on Google. In ...
Justice, Democracy, and Law is a recurring series by Edward B. Foley that focuses on election law and the relationship of law and democracy. Please note that the views of outside contributors do not ...
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments Thursday over former President Trump’s ballot eligibility under the 14th Amendment, a historic showdown that thrust the justices into the center of the 2024 ...
The justices largely focused on the impact of disqualification nationwide. The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday appeared highly critical of a Colorado Supreme Court decision that would ban former ...
The provision disqualifies former government officials from holding office if they took an oath to support the Constitution but then betrayed it by engaging in an insurrection. By Charlie Savage The U ...
Two seemingly contradictory impressions emerged from almost three hours of oral argument Thursday before the Supreme Court: The case for Donald Trump’s eligibility to be president again was quite weak ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback